Evaluate context, review controls and the operations you actually use.
| Claim | Public evidence |
|---|---|
| Provider live execution | 0 of 299 operations verified live, across 27 integrations. See each operation |
| Customer revenue outcome | No published case study. Published evidence and its limits |
| Product workflows | What you can check instead |
| Security and data handling | Current practices and policy details |
Compare workflow steps, approval controls, provider operations, pricing and source dates. Each product comparison explains when the other product is a better fit.
Read the comparisonsCluster is infrastructure for an agent you already run. Sales as Code is the revenue org you run before you hire one. Which half of go-to-market you need decides it.
Pick Cluster if: Your pipeline is empty and your next job is filling it. Buy them, and come back when the accounts need working.
Clay builds the list and enriches it. Sales as Code works the accounts once you have them, across nine roles, on a schedule.
Pick Clay if: Your problem is building and enriching lists, and you have somebody whose job is to sit in the tool.
Apollo is a contact database with sequences and a dialer on top. Sales as Code is nine scheduled roles that work the accounts you already have.
Pick Apollo if: You need contacts and a way to work through them at volume, and the roles past the first meeting are already covered by people.
An AI SDR plays one role and mostly sends on its own. Sales as Code plays nine and sends nothing without your click.
Pick an AI SDR if: Top of funnel volume is the only thing you are short of, and you have somebody who will read the outbox.